Is The Proportion Of Customers With A Child In The Vehicle That Choose To Use The Drive-Thru Greater Than The Proportion Of Customers With A Child In The Vehicle That Choose To Order From The Inside Dining Area Of The McDonalds In Newton, MA Between 11:30 am and 1:30 pm On A Saturday?
05/26/05
Buckingham Browne & Nichols School
Cambridge, MA
May 2005
Table of Contents......................................................................... 2
Abstract........................................................................................... 3
Study............................................................................................... 4
Research Question................................................................................................ 4
Sampling................................................................................................................. 4
Data......................................................................................................................... 6
Significance Test................................................................................................... 7
Magnitude.............................................................................................................. 9
Discussion.................................................................................... 10
Weaknesses in the Study................................................................................... 10
Extrapolation....................................................................................................... 10
Conclusion................................................................................... 12
In the following study, the proportions of customers of a McDonalds with children in their vehicle that ordered from the drive-thru and that ordered from the inside dining area were compared. The main goal of the study was to give the restaurant any information on the types of customers that order from the drive-thru more for the purpose of advertising. If a significant result was found, then the restaurant might want to advertise to the family audience that it has a drive-thru. It was expected that the population proportion that ordered from the drive-thru would be higher than the population proportion that ordered from the inside dining area because it is easier for a guardian with a child in the car to not have to unfasten the child and potentially deal with tantrums in the restaurant.
After performing a Two Sample Z-Test of
Significance, it was discovered that the sample provided no evidence to reject
the null hypothesis that the proportion of customers with children in the
vehicle ordering from the drive-thru was equal to the proportion that ordered
from the inside dining area (nDrive-Thru = 40, nInside =
40, p = 0.18066). The magnitude of the results was calculated by constructing a
95% confidence interval. Because the test did not provide significant evidence
to reject the null hypothesis at the
level, it was known that zero would be
included in the interval (-0.1136, 0.3136).
The two samples were taken from the McDonalds in Newton, MA on a Saturday between 11:30 am and 1:30 pm. A child was to count for the sample as a success if it was sitting in a car seat or booster seat. This caused the major weakness in the sampling process because there was no definite age limit of the children that were considered ÒchildrenÓ for the samples. This could have contributed to the sample not providing any evidence to reject Ho.
Based on the results of this observational study,
I will compare the difference between two proportions. The proportions are from
the population of vehicles with children in them that park allowing any of the
occupants to go into the inside dining area of the McDonalds and order their food
and the proportion of vehicles with children in them that order from the
drive-thru. Both populations only include data from between 11:30 am and 1:30
pm on Saturday.
I would expect the proportion of customers with
children in their vehicles that choose to order from the drive-thru to be
higher than the proportion of customers that choose to order from the inner
dining area. I expect this result because it is easier and safer for guardians
with children in the car to go through the drive-thru because he/she does not
have carry the child into the restaurant and deal with the kicking, screaming,
and other hassles a child could potentially make. Also, the parent would not
have to worry about the safety of the child if it was left in the car.
The
data for the samples of this study were collected from two populations of
customers that eat at the McDonalds in Newton, MA between 11:30 am and 1:30 pm
on Saturday. The populations were the proportion of customers that had children
in their vehicle that either ordered from the drive-thru or the inside dining
area. This site and time were ideal conditions for my study because Newton is a
residential area where there are many young families with children. I was able
to find many subjects because many families were going out to lunch at the
specified time. Even if the families were not going out for lunch together,
there will still be many children that would have been taken out to lunch by
either guardians of the child, relatives, or friends.
To
collect data I sat in my car, which was parked in the middle row of the lot
between the entrance to the McDonalds and the dining area of the McDonalds
(diagram 1). From my vantage point, I was able to see if the vehicle went
through the drive-thru (picture 1). If the vehicle went through the drive-thru,
the subjectÕs data was used for the Òdrive-thruÓ sample. If the vehicle did not
go through the drive-thru, the subject was used for the Òinside dining areaÓ
sample. From my vantage point, I was not able to see if the customer actually
ordered from the drive-thru, but I could see if the customer picked up the
order from the pick-up window (picture 2). If a subject did not pick up a meal
from the pick-up window, then it was counted as ordering from the inside dining
area.
Once
the sample that the subject belonged to was determined, I determined if there
was a child so that the vehicle could be considered a success for the sample.
From my vantage point, if I could not determine whether there definitely was or
was not a child, the subject was rejected. A subject was considered to have a
child in the backseat that counted as a child for the sample if it was sitting
in a car seat designed for children, or a booster seat integrated into the car
designed for children.
For the purposes of randomization, I did not use
every subject observed in the original sample. For the sample of customers
going through the drive-thru, I assigned each subject a two-digit number
between 01 and 85. For the sample of customers ordering from the inside dining
area, I assigned each subject a number between 01 and 75. Then separately for
each sample, I used a random digits table to select a new sample of 40
subjects. 1 For every two digits the
generator output, I corresponded them to one of the subjects.2 If a number that was generated did not
correspond to a subject, it was rejected and a new pair was generated. If a
number was repeated, it was rejected and a new pair was generated.
The reason for randomization is because there
might have been a caravan of families and/or friends that might have been
coming from a previous event, such as a bar/bat mitzvah or reunion. In this
case, they might all have chosen to order from the interior counter, but if the
family came alone they might have chosen to use the drive through. Also, some
families might have been be too large to fit in one car. In this case, there
might have been two cars, one with at least one child in it, and one car with
no children in it. This would have resulted in a false-negative result for the
car with no children in it, no matter which means of getting the food the
family chose.
See attached appendix
Hypothesis:
Ð>The true population proportion of
customers with children in their vehicle that go through the drive-thru is
equal to the true proportion of customers with children in their vehicle that
order from the inside dining area at the McDonalds in Newton between 11:30 am
and 1:30 pm on a Saturday.
Ð>The true population proportion of
customers with children in their vehicle that go through the drive-thru is
greater than the true proportion of customers with children in their vehicle
that order from the inside dining area at the McDonalds in Newton between 11:30
am and 1:30 pm on a Saturday.
Symbols:
= Drive-Thru Sample Size
= Inside Dining Area Sample Size
= Proportion of the combined number of
children in the vehicle of
customers who go through the drive-thru and who
order from the inside dining area
= Sample Proportion of customers who
order from the drive-thru
= Sample Proportion of customers who
order from the inside dining
area
Conditions:
1. Both samples are independently selected
simple random samples : Ã
2. ![]()
![]()
![]()
Z-Test Statistic: Graph:
![]()
![]()
Significant at
: X
The
sample provides no evidence to reject the null hypothesis (nDrive-Thru
= 40, nInside = 40, p = 0.18066). Thus, the true population
proportion of customers with children on their vehicle is equal for the
customers who order from the drive-thru and the inside dining area.
Conditions:
1. Both samples are independently selected simple
random samples : Ã
2. Customers going through drive-thru
10
Ð> 40
10
: Ã
Customers
ordering from inside dining area
10
Ð> 40
10
: Ã
Interval:
![]()

![]()
Conclusion:
I
can say with 95% confidence that the difference between the true proportions of
customers with children in their vehicle who order from the drive-thru and who
order from the inside dining area falls between the interval (-0.1136, 0.3136).
I can also conclude that if I were to take 100 samples with the same sample
sizes as in these samples, approximately 95 of them would be included in this
interval (-0.1136, 0.3136).
There
were a few weaknesses in the sampling process that may have influenced the
results collected. The most important is the way in which children were deemed
to be ÒchildrenÓ for the study. Subjects were considered to children if they
were sitting in a car seat, because the goal of the study was to show that
parents or guardians would be more likely to take a child in a car seat through
the drive-thru rather than unstrapping them from the car seat and ordering for
them from the inside dining area. The weakness comes from the fact that there
are different ages for children who travel in car seats. Some children stop
traveling in car seats as young as three years old, but others may still in car
seats or booster seats until they are as old as seven. Thus, there may have
been children who could have been considered to count as ÒchildrenÓ for the
sample, but were not because they did not actually travel in a car seat. The
opposite scenario could also have easily taken place, with an older child who
did not mature as quickly as he or she should have matured. In this case, the
child would have been counted when it was actually older than the targeted age
for the study.
The
results from this study can be extrapolated represent a population that is
bigger than the one observed. The population of all McDonalds in suburban,
residential areas with the option of ordering from a drive-thru can be
represented. This is due to the fact that in Newton, where the sample was
selected, there are many places for families with children to get together and
have an occasion for going out to lunch before hand or afterwards. If the
different locations have a similar proportion of customers with children in the
vehicle, then they should distribute themselves similarly when ordering from
the drive-thru or the inside dining area.
The
results from this study cannot however be extrapolated to represent a
population that includes customers ordering outside the observed time on the
observed day. This is because the Saturday lunch hour is probably the busiest
time for customers with children because during the week, the children are most
likely to be at school. Also, on Sunday there are probably going to be fewer
children eating with their parents because there are obligations they may have
to their family and or religion. The results can also not represent any other
time on Saturday because for the morning hours of the day, children are likely
to be sleeping because they tend to sleep longer than adults. Also, kids tend
not to go out very much at night when they are very young, especially if the
parents are not present and the child is under supervision of a guardian.
My
alternative hypothesis that the true population proportion of customers of the
McDonalds in Newton, MA between 11:30 am and 1:30 pm on a Saturday with
children in their vehicle that ordered from the drive-thru would be greater
than the proportion that ordered from the inside dining area was unable to be
accepted after analyzing the data. The test that provided no evidence to reject
the null hypothesis at the
level had a z test statistic of
(z=0.9129) and a p-value of (p=0.18066). A 95% confidence interval was also
performed to support the conclusion found from the significance test. Because
the test was not significant at the
level, it was known that zero would be
included in the 95% confidence interval, which was calculated to be (-0.1136,
0.3136). From the sample observed, I must continue to assume that there is no
significant difference in the proportion of customers with children in their
vehicle that order from the drive-thru and who order from the inside dining area.
Although
the sample that was observed did not provide any evidence to reject the null
hypothesis, different results may have been found if the sampling process was
changed slightly. If there had been a more definite way of cutting off the age
of the children that were considered to be ÒchildrenÓ for the sample, more
accurate results would have been found. Also, because the subjects for the
sample used to compute the test of significance and the confidence interval
were randomly selected from a larger sample, a significant difference in the
proportions may have been found if different subjects were randomly selected.
Even though there was not a significant difference found in the proportions, if
more accurate sampling methods are used, different results may be found.
Parking
Lot Diagram

Exit Entrance
Random Digits Table Used
For Selecting Samples
Column
Row
1 2
3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10
1 57245 39666 18545 50534
57654 25519 35477 71309 12212 98911
2 42726 58321 59267 72742
53968 63679 54095 56563 09820 86291
3 82768 32694 62828 19097
09877 32093 23518 08654 64815 19894
4 97742 58918 33317 34192
06286 39824 74264 01941 95810 26247
5 48332 38634 20510 09198
56256 04431 22753 20944 95319 29515
6 26700 40484 28341 25428
08806 98858 04816 16317 94928 05512
7 66156 16407 57395 86230
47495 13908 97015 58225 82255 01956
8 64062 10061 01923 29260
32771 71002 58132 58646 69089 63694
9 24713 95591 26970 37647
26282 89759 69034 55281 64853 50837
10 90417 18344 22436 77006
87841 94322 45526 38145 86554 42733
11 78886 86557 11295 07253
29289 44814 58898 36929 66839 81250
12 39681 54696 38482 48217
73598 93649 92705 34912 18981 74299
13 38265 45196 31143 82190
27279 79883 20219 38823 84543 22119
14 34270 41885 00079 63600
59152 10670 27951 77830 05368 58315
15 73869 34748 75787 88844
89522 71436 04166 06246 20952 56808
16 21732 36017 69149 70330
90500 73110 92908 55789 73450 68282
17 72583 49811 67519 98476
97889 37112 94963 91140 24571 23446
18 72678 49483 57039 18420
74773 16869 72077 27720 14058 66743
19 88572 01294 14117 56884 77107
53023 02243 26415 52233 12818
20 82868 59988 42323 96542
96733 00056 74887 21914 48300 96404
21 09949 56572 28104 64281
01217 76250 39511 19059 85172 35273
22 41942 91440 81609 38147
59406 88491 18079 29786 81499 85390
23 46777 74928 91290 55022
56629 01335 61379 71134 86187 70717
24 58280 17867 07990 85055
55279 83390 37598 93350 05666 55402
25 87042 55080 76185 19947
79551 77594 87381 99430 44251 30896
26 72183 39856 94385 55160
50680 68443 95437 74302 06204 71004
27 76768 16066 94109 90685 92058 81744 99133 36354 34292 90092
28 21703 64616 03431 47610
31968 61593 36259 70600 53491 95542
29 78269 12087 32204 81177
30333 83630 06026 89308 94179 54907
30 49285 16579 22109 63651
34778 28631 27285 95751 91704 59819
31 90016 10303 81862 41351
88681 76632 15336 91955 38436 43892
32 63651 93677 08027 80384
71134 79937 23322 10577 21413 86688
33 02780 37186 74076 33376
03782 64199 77333 12812 78027 89926
34 49414 09022 38644 53038
34634 36565 01984 88477 83879 60943
35 53861 74046 04778 08365
83104 79004 88335 54047 99675 41864
36 78677 55123 73447 00158
61482 02808 83475 59932 19044 27318
37 74550 84403 56850 83780
88847 65591 03859 58670 60057 25225
38 22866 64152 35023 35701
98228 53388 82321 34392 09589 97340
39 17601 32926 06120 27626
48687 42885 25858 53920 95764 84716
40 20862 64222 96951 19524
15866 52508 03763 98033 87268 71167
41 71490 83428 78903 81931
24345 37331 03971 38118 01065 36010
42 21050 12825 28217 99510
86900 09987 91244 06520 81108 87266
43 91632 96199 54191 77480
33049 00849 96668 65865 25164 98330
44 46988 84607 55711 43874
26532 76307 38846 55961 83227 16069
45 72200 24023 55848 09162
44976 15663 34697 83365 82930 63392
46 88621 25822 78463 72191
00625 85945 72522 29613 46473 51177
47 15384 03326 32091 20199
70046 64343 20566 79050 43837 15831
48 46499 94631 17985 09369
19009 51848 58794 48921 22845 55264
49 13520 96795 79714 66338
79836 44430 89290 06167 69090 29476
50 24323 00280 73922 43447
00319 92899 75411 91840 39594 17621
51 99090 55543 87734 80685
74261 70848 87196 59085 28471 74971
52 97585 33311 68919 33189
49987 24081 79404 45363 46920 94760
53 97622 85282 58594 83977
25002 39124 58350 67845 17771 58031
54 24260 21646 75111 41560
90082 57613 93807 04060 94811 60124
55 65250 83876 34806 08796
53719 94310 94363 55289 81226 18190
56 45817 37470 73508 84200
73933 80187 26207 69917 58064 95000
57 48898 28088 77723 81458 18981
35389 17199 85718 18019 66290
58 23900 87304 91349 27541
42047 23002 47976 99586 96453 06861
59 38635 66539 55139 56894
01608 05068 21910 41858 15382 98701
60 58095 49005 59108 12315
35856 19651 55545 79711 42424 67008
61 76474 40345 47744 45224
42903 86698 09851 87819 81523 34272
62 03535 70021 61645 84268
65636 94414 06266 12237 43147 16894
63 14364 82782 07176 53522
06834 46016 42758 04753 00023 15300
64 91751 29817 90578 31800
13393 35965 41128 92983 61660 50106
65 56151 59329 22926 66357
41724 68645 04327 27543 18723 11957
66 57881 15295 43246 47103
15977 84216 78875 06677 77219 50803
67 36126 70899 51669 79958
93311 62555 70694 16626 35623 18758
68 73389 33283 66929 73444
31434 10263 16868 74346 84838 82770
69 77383 40683 84063 45412
21358 84024 88935 77583 33522 53090
70 62798 96248 60474 36149
21187 23194 03696 74445 54525 12869
71 12283 00561 29955 05775
34520 47217 26059 35414 65998 49766
72 78433 49762 41177 80949
32843 64714 40450 15064 11389 78409
73 26348 29480 65497 34615
12888 19977 17597 25914 36394 79315
74 26078 36705 83043 61592
12459 61255 40550 59892 66163 97848
75 40115 70829 00654 12791
85668 19015 82785 92889 35041 18949
76 81560 62666 77627 09123
63484 49481 60451 88073 71000 63511
77 34074 51484 59356 20301
22365 95862 46995 26284 45273 35706
78 42176 81350 05941 09754
16987 98248 90319 33116 39120 34765
79 63288 62381 58461 13225
57138 19619 30877 82640 24888 02600
80 88820 33240 78977 98928
41160 29671 33299 95592 38493 05321
81 63532 20433 25690 09557
90207 95808 57383 68622 13359 25371
82 39033 68857 74705 91718
77485 32496 30737 28551 69056 95615
83 46964 90715 01804 14953
97658 71613 90353 78189 03195 73795
84 03528 92683 29740 31679
22941 92131 69021 21325 70930 19548
85 67027 36641 74347 54500
80074 94364 10164 99309 66272 24925
86 65462 73352 17392 09552
74361 46123 13020 63169 98318 91666
87 55797 95254 84279 88885
65569 96791 66118 05817 17867 88254
88 58697 56009 20438 06653
93978 51961 97609 97367 02795 04718
89 97876 76551 19215 87623
55326 85282 86292 18328 55016 84126
90 72443 02607 13183 06156
76680 62398 79369 77374 78292 41027
91 96152 80526 62087 12197
59252 68312 39759 63535 23675 47358
92 10277 64926 33378 48335
35488 47577 85954 97588 75873 31350
93 77557 25011 86663 97410
99845 42709 48407 63841 14727 00484
94 68784 85951 54232 30976
48666 15927 73072 00907 76237 56914
95 67778 30262 16944 36130
77604 34923 92336 66565 94490 68039
96 94104 06985 81837 53674
36266 21688 68769 18492 12242 34164
97 70107 17900 53497 71908
18186 59909 00400 53236 23016 70860
98 07847 64852 37719 68837
60757 92158 80433 17687 08916 01706
99 33167 35411 27473 13393
17714 59680 30888 98213 93364 03219
100
84527 88986 01665 23547 74666 25487 34977 59681 38520 57293
2 The sample of the drive-thru population was selected by reading from left to right and selecting every two digits starting from the first column on the left and reading down ten rows, then going to the next column to the right and reading down ten more rows. The sample of the inside dining area population was collected by starting from the tenth column, reading left to right, and continuing straight down for each row. Samples of forty were selected for each population.